Custom Election Sites - Benefitting Voters AND Candidates
THE PROBLEM It is discouraging that we live in the most advanced democratic country in the world, and yet the following statements are true for most elections (e.g., community groups, boards, universities, local/city/state government).
- Voters never have a strong understanding of the candidates’ views and key issues
- Researching candidates and issues is difficult and time-consuming
- Candidates rarely provide substance on their views and plans
- Political campaigns are resource-intensive and do not provide voters with adequate information
THE SOLUTION The solution to these problems is a build-your-own election site (software as a service model - SaaS) that functions as a central repository of candidate-submitted information in a consistent format and length. The site allows voters to easily consume useable information about each candidate and key issue. The core content/functionality of the site includes a candidate page, an issues page and a PDF export feature for voters to download/print/distribute all of the site content. Functionality and design inspiration come from 37 Signals’ Basecamp, Squarespace, EventBrite, Google Sites, MailChimp, and SurveyMonkey.
HOW IT WORKS Prior to an election, an independent group (election organizer, board, committee, newspaper etc.) creates an Election Site and determines the fields to be included on each candidate’s profile page, key issues that each candidate will provide content for, and length/format requirements for this content (e.g., a one-page PDF, 1,000 words, 5-minute video). Once the profile fields and key issues have been determined, candidates are notified to submit/upload their content. All of the content would be made public at the same time. Voters can view candidate profile pages and each issue individually, or in comparison matrices. There would be a submission deadline and all content would become visible at the same time. At this point the Election Site can be promoted to voter constituents.
USER BENEFITS Candidates: The Election Site gives candidates a high-visibility, free, and substance-focused campaign tool. Voters: The Election Site centralizes quality and consumable information. Election Organizers: The Election Site equips election organizers with a central resource to promote.
ADDITIONAL FEATURES While the primary goal of an Election Site is to provide useable information to voters, there are many additional features that may be appropriate for certain elections. Advanced features could include: online voting, video speeches, virtual forums and town halls, campaign contribution processing, social media feeds, site templates and design/CSS customization, event calendars, news aggregators, and email updates.
FORESEEABLE CHALLENGES The usefulness of an Election Site is dependent upon candidate participation and content quality. While candidates could be required to submit content for many smaller elections (e.g., student governments at universities), there would be a greater challenge with government elections. Ideally candidates see the value in an election site and provide quality content, however, additional steps may need to be taken to ensure thorough and detailed information is provided. For example, an election organizer may require a one-page PDF on from candidates on their views on the city’s transportation issue and a separate one-page PDF on their tangible plan/ideas to address that issue. Lastly, further research is needed to determine the most appropriate person/group to initiate and manage the implementation of an Election Site (e.g., government office, independent nonprofits, local newspaper).
MARKET ENTRY VISION 0-2 Years: Election Sites are perceived as a “cool” technology and are used for student government elections 2-5 Years: Election Sites are perceived as a “useful” tool and are used by local governments and universities 5 + Years: Election Sites are perceived as a “standard” tool and are demanded by voters in every election

6 comments
William WAUGH • about 13 years ago
I have been suggesting something similar to this idea. I think such a site should somehow be set up to behave as though it were owned partly by the voters and partly by the candidates. Voters and candidates, not a newspaper, should have the power to include issues and questions. Also, when addressing government elections, the site should run a straw poll. This of course wouldn't substitute for official election results, but it would help inform the voters about how much support each candidate has from the other voters. And of course the straw poll should use Score Voting or at least Approval Voting. For so long as the official government elections fail to use such advanced voting systems, the subject platform could facilitate and publish any agreements that groups of candidates might wish to make to the effect that those among them who don't receive the most support in the straw would drop out and urge their supporters to vote for the most popular of the group, in the official election.
Geoffrey Aydor • about 13 years ago
Thanks for the feedback! I completely agree with your point about the voters/candidates ownership. I am still struggling with the most appropriate person/group to host and operate the service. Eager to get more feedback/ideas on this... Straw poll functionality would also be helpful. I don't think it would be appropriate for all elections, though could be easily integrated and simply turned on/off by the admin.
Are you a professor? If so, I was in your last semester! Small world... Would be happy to connect further about this idea if you're interested. I've been pitching it to various tech/political companies...
William WAUGH • about 13 years ago
I am not a professor.
William WAUGH • about 13 years ago
Here are my thoughts on this kind of thing http://wp.me/p23U97-8w
Geoffrey Aydor • about 13 years ago
Very interesting idea - thanks for sharing.
Harlan Johnson • about 13 years ago
I liked your video. Great goal - my entry shows one focused strategy to help accomplish more informed participation in elections as they are currently set up. I believe it will increase voter turnout, and it provides a greater opportunity for anyone with no vast money backing to win. Look at my submission. "Elections Clarified" https://vimeo.com/64616892 or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQZSII6C3-A Maybe we can work together some way. I'd love to hear from you.